men and galaxies

原文

Lesson 45

Of men and galaxies

What is the most influential factor in any human society?

In man's early days, competition with other creatures must have been critical.

But this phase of our development is now finished.

Indeed, we lack practice and experience nowadays in dealing with primitive conditions.

I am sure that, without modern weapons,

I would make a very poor show of disputing the ownership of a cave with a bear, and in this I do not think that I stand alone.

The last creature to compete with man was the mosquito.

But even the mosquito has been subdued by attention to drainage and by chemical sprays.

Competition between ourselves, person against person,

community against community, still persists, however; and it is as fierce as it ever was.

But the competition of man against man is not the simple process envisioned in biology.

It is not a simple competition for a fixed amount of food determined by the physical environment,

because the environment that determines our evolution is no longer essentially physical.

Our environment is chiefly conditoned by the things we believe.

Morocco and California are bits of the Earth in very similar latitudes,

both on the west coasts of continents with similar climates, and probably with rather similar natural resources.

Yet their present development is wholly different,

not so much because of different people even,

but because of the different thoughts that exist in the minds of their inhabitants.

This is the point I wish to emphasize.

The most important factor in our environment is the state of our own minds.

It is well known that where the white man has invaded a primitive culture,

the most destructive effects have come not from physical weapons but from ideas.

Ideas are dangerous.

The Holy Office knew this full well when it caused heretics to be burned in days gone by.

Indeed, the concept of free speech only exists in our modern society because when you are inside a community,

you are conditioned by the conventions of the community to such a degree that it is very difficult to conceive of anything really destructive.

It is only someone looking on from outside that can inject the dangerous thoughts.

I do not doubt that it would be possible to inject ideas into the modern world that would utterly destroy us.

I would like to give you an example, but fortunately I cannot do so.

Perhaps it will suffice to mention the nuclear bomb.

Imagine the effect on a reasonably advanced technological society,

one that still does not possess the bomb, of making it aware of the possibility, of supplying suffcient details to enable the thing to be constructed.

20 or 30 pages of information handed to any of the major world powers around the year 1925,

would have been sufficient to change the course of world history.

It is a strange thought, but I believe a correct one,

that twenty or thirty pages of ideas and information would be capable of turning the present-day world upside down, or even destroying it.

I have often tried to conceive of what those pages might contain,

but of course I cannot do so because I am a prisoner of the present-day world, just as all of you are.

We cannot think outside the particular patterns that our brains are conditioned to, or,

to be more accurate we can think only a very little way outside and then only if we are very original.

译文

第45课

关于人类与星系

在任何人类社会中,最具影响力的因素是什么?

在人类早期,与其他生物的竞争肯定至关重要。

但我们发展的这个阶段现在已经结束了。

确实,如今我们在应对恶劣环境(或原始条件)时缺乏相应的实践经验和能力。

我确信,如果没有现代武器的话,

如果我要和一只熊争论某个洞穴的所有权,那我肯定会表现得非常愚蠢(或者说:我的行为会显得极其愚蠢)。而且,我认为不止我一个人会有这种想法。

最后一种与人类竞争的生物是蚊子。

不过,就连蚊子也因为人们对排水系统的重视以及化学喷雾的使用而得到了控制(即蚊子的数量被减少了)。

人与人之间的竞争;

然而,社区之间的对立与冲突依然存在,而且比以往任何时候都更加激烈。

但是人与人之间的竞争,并不是生物学中所描述的那种简单的过程。

这并不是一场简单的比赛;比赛中的食物数量并不是由自然环境(即物理条件)来决定的。

因为决定我们进化的环境已经不再是纯粹的物理环境(即,影响我们进化的因素不再仅仅局限于物理因素)。

我们的环境在很大程度上是由我们的信念所塑造的。

摩洛哥和加利福尼亚都位于相似的纬度线上。

它们都位于各大洲的西海岸,拥有相似的气候条件,以及可能相当相似的自然资源。

然而,他们目前的发展状况却完全不同。

其实,这并不完全是因为人与人之间的差异……

但是,由于这些地方居民的思维方式各不相同(即他们的想法和观念存在差异),情况就变得复杂了。

这就是我想强调的重点。

我们环境中最重要的因素,就是我们自己心理的状态。

众所周知,每当白人侵入原始文化时,

最具破坏性的影响并非来自物理武器,而是来自思想。

想法是危险的。

在过去的岁月里,当宗教裁判所将异端分子处以火刑时,他们对此再清楚不过了。

的确,言论自由这一概念只存在于我们的现代社会中。因为当人们身处一个特定的社群(或社区)时,言论自由才得以实现。

你深受社区习俗的影响,以至于很难想象任何真正具有破坏性的行为或事物。

只有那些从外部观察的人,才有可能灌输那些危险的思想。

我毫不怀疑,将某些有害的思想引入现代社会是完全可能的;这些思想很可能会对我们造成毁灭性的影响。

我想给你举个例子,但幸运的是,我无法做到这一点。

或许只需提到核弹就足够了。

想象一下这对一个技术相当先进的社会会产生什么样的影响吧。

那个仍然没有掌握这种技术的人,也没有意识到这种技术的可能性,更没有提供足够的细节来帮助人们制造出这种装置。

大约在1925年,如果有任何世界大国收到这样20到30页的信息资料的话……

这本足以改变世界历史的进程。

这是个奇怪的想法,但我相信它是正确的。

那些二十到三十页的内容(其中包含了各种想法和信息)有可能彻底改变当今的世界,甚至将其摧毁。

我经常试图想象那些页面上可能包含些什么内容。

但当然,我无法做到这一点——因为我就像你们所有人一样,是这个现代社会的“囚徒”。

我们无法跳出大脑所习惯的特定思维模式来进行思考。

更准确地说,我们只能稍微超出常规思维的范围去思考;而且只有当我们真正具备创新性(即非常“有创意”)时,才能做到这一点。

0:00
0:00

词汇表

competition

名词
英:/ˌkɒmpəˈtɪʃən/
美:/ˌkɑːmpəˈtɪʃən/
定义
1. 竞争 - The activity or condition of competing, especially in business, sports, or evolution.

例子: In business, healthy competition drives innovation.

例子: The competition for resources in nature can be fierce.

2. 竞赛 - A contest or rivalry between individuals or groups.

例子: The annual science competition attracts students from around the world.

例子: She won the competition by performing exceptionally well.

近义词
rivalry: 强调竞争中的敌对关系,常用于个人或团体间的较量,而 'competition' 更中性,适用于结构化活动。
contention: 更正式,常暗示冲突或争论,'competition' 则更侧重于积极的竞争。
contest: 通常指具体的比赛或事件,'competition' 则可以是更广泛的概念。
反义词:
cooperation, collaboration, harmony
用法
常用于描述竞争环境,如商业、生物学或社会语境中,常见搭配包括 'in competition with' 或 'face competition',在正式语境中使用较多。
形式:
复数: competitions

关键句型 "I would like to [verb phrase]."

定义

此句型是一种礼貌表达个人意愿或请求的结构,通常用于提出建议、表达欲望或寻求许可。基本形式为:I would like to(我想要)+ [verb phrase](动词短语)。根据《剑桥英语语法》教材,这里的 would like 是情态动词 wouldlike 的结合,源自虚拟语气,旨在使语言更委婉和礼貌,避免直接命令式表达。

例如,在文章中,“I would like to give you an example” 清晰地展示了这种结构,用于表示一种有礼貌的意图。

它在英语中扮演着关键角色,帮助学习者在日常对话中保持友好和尊重。

用法

此句型主要用于正式或半正式场合,如表达个人愿望、提出请求或描述假设情景。规则包括:主语(如 I)+ would like to + 动词原形 + 其他短语。would like to 后必须接动词原形,形成不定式短语。

在语法体系中,它属于情态动词表达意愿的范畴,与直接表达如 I want to 相比,更柔和且正式。横向比较:与 I want to [verb] 不同,I would like to 减少了强势感,适合社交场合;与 Could I [verb] 相比,它更侧重于个人意愿而非能力请求。例如,I would like to go 表达礼貌的欲望,而 Could I go 询问许可。

跨语法联系:此句型与条件句或虚拟语气相关,如在假设情景中使用(e.g., "If I had time, I would like to travel")。它还能扩展到其他主语,如 He would like to,并与其他结构结合,如 I would like to ask you something,帮助学习者连接到更广泛的语法网络,比如情态动词的过去形式。

总之,此句型在英语对话中非常实用,尤其在讨论计划或意见时,能提升交流的和谐度。

注意事项

学生常犯的错误包括:直接用 want to 替换 would like to,导致语气过于生硬(例如,"I want to give an example" 比 "I would like to give an example" 更直接且不那么礼貌);或遗漏 to,说成 "I would like give",这会使句子 grammatically incorrect。

另一个常见问题是用错时态,例如在过去语境中误用,如 "I would liked to go" 应为 "I would like to go"。纠正建议:多练习缩写形式 I’d like to,并注意语调保持温和。提供例句帮助区分:

错误示例:I would like go to the park.  (缺少 'to')
正确示例:I would like to go to the park.  (添加 'to' 以正确形成不定式)
错误示例:I want to explain this now.  (过于直接,在正式场合不合适)
正确示例:I would like to explain this now.  (更礼貌)

通过这些例句,学生可以学会避免常见陷阱,提升表达的精确性。

练习

一个原创例子:在会议中表达意见时,可以说:"I would like to share my thoughts on this topic." 学生可以替换 [verb phrase],如改为 "I would like to discuss the plan" 或 "I would like to suggest an idea",并想象在不同场景中使用,例如在课堂上说 "I would like to ask a question."

这种替换练习能让学生将句型应用到实际生活,如在朋友聚会中礼貌地提出活动建议,从而加深对句型的掌握和自信心。

额外内容

背景知识:这个句型起源于英语的礼貌传统,早在中古英语时期,would 就用于软化语言,以避免冲突。在文化上,它反映了英语国家强调个人空间和礼节的价值观。对比分析:与中文的 "我想…" 类似,但英语通过 would 的语法结构实现礼貌,而非单纯词汇;相比法语的 "Je voudrais…",英语版本更简单,因为不需要动词变位。

了解这些背景能帮助学生欣赏英语的细腻表达,并扩展到更高级的用法,如在写作中用于正式信件。